filling up space
 web links


Christianbook.com
 creation
 politics
 bible prophecy
 middle east
more

The Sword Is Mightier than the Pen
By Travis K. McSherley

Change.  Change is hiding around every corner, every day.  We can't avoid it, however much we may resist.  Societies change, cultures change, attitudes change, people change.  Need proof?  Just look at yourself now, as compared to five, ten, fifteen years ago.  Look at the United States and how much change we have endured, from being a struggling group of thirteen states trying to come together, to the superpower of the world.  Change is sometimes good, sometimes bad; but one thing is for sure -- change is inevitable.

Well, almost.

One does exist who has never changed, and who will never change.  Maybe it seems like an obvious concept, but it's one that we seem to take for granted all too often: God does not change -- ever.  He makes this claim Himself in Malachi 3:6, saying, "For I am the LORD, I change not."

Hebrews 13:8 makes the point additionally clear: "Jesus Christ the same, yesterday, and to day, and for ever."

We quote the Hebrews verse all the time, but why do so many try to discredit it?  From a Christian point of view, one of the most serious problems with political correctness is that it attempts to change the unchangeable Creator of the Universe and devalue His preeminence (if not flat out denying His existence).

Do we really want a God who can "go with the flow"?  A God who changes cannot be trustworthy or reliable.  Even worse, change implies imperfection.  And if we serve an imperfect, unreliable God, what happens to our "promise" of eternal salvation?  What if He decides that Jesus' sacrifice on the cross just isn't good enough anymore?  Can we ever really be sure of our place in Heaven, if God can change at a moment's notice?

Political correctness, at its roots, is about change.  We applaud ourselves for our "acceptance" of the differences among people or their values; and we dare not say, do, or think anything that might belittle those differences, regardless of how our own ideas might conflict.  Homosexuality is to be "accepted" as simply a different form of lifestyle.  Men and women are to be "accepted" as exact equals in every area of life.  All religions are to be "accepted" as just different means to the same end.  Yet, anyone who does not conform to these "rules" is not to be "accepted."

But wait a minute -- God doesn't fit those standards.  He doesn't "tolerate" sexual sin in any form.  He created men and women equal, but each with distinct responsibilities.  He abhors all other forms of worship not focused on Him (Exodus 20:1-5).  From a sermon entitled "Is God Politically Correct?", the writer says this:

Political correctness would label GOD'S CLAIM TO UNIVERSAL SUPREMACY AS GROSS RACIAL PREJUDICE AND ETHNOCENTRICITY!  That is the logical end of these thoughts....God's people are NOT to learn the ways of the nations round about them or to dabble in their religions because those religions are WRONG!  Such bold statements go completely against the modern propoganda... (1)
Furthermore, God's plan of salvation is not "fair."  I mean, if I am a good, useful, "tolerant" person, then I should be as entitled as the next guy to go to Heaven, right?  But God's offer isn't meant to be a "fair" one.  What would be "fair" is for the Supreme Judge to allow every single one of us to go to hell for our wickedness.  "For the wages of sin is death..." (Romans 6:23a, emphasis mine).  We've all sinned, I'm sure, which means we have all earned the death sentence.  But instead of letting us dig our own graves straight to hell, God stepped in and made a sacrifice to pay our sin debt in full.  All you have to do is accept it.  Just?  Fair?  Not at all; allowing someone else to receive your punishment is hardly fair.  But it's an offer you can't afford to pass up.

Just ask the man on the cross behind Jesus's on Golgotha.

The man had probably been a career criminal.  He was a thief, and he knew it.  His counterpart on the third cross yelled at the dying carpenter/preacher from Nazareth, hoping that He would rescue all three of them from the hill of their execution.  But the other understood the penalty they were receiving.  "Don't you get it?" he yelled, with a sorrowful anger.  "We've been nailed to these crosses by our own wrong-doings.  But this Jesus guy, he hasn't done anything!"
Then he softened his voice, turned to the battered prisoner on the front cross, and humbly said, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom."

Jesus turned His head slightly, drops of blood coming from the thorn scratches on His head.  Perhaps now realizing the true vastness of the victory He was about to claim, He said to the man, "Today, you will be with me in paradise." (2)

Nevertheless, we still often have trouble accepting God's gift and the responsibilities that come with it.  While nothing we do can add to or take away from the perfect and complete salvation secured through Christ, James reminds us that "faith without works is dead" (James 2:26).  "But someone will say, 'You have faith; I have deeds.'  Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do"  (James 2:18 NIV).

James, who wrote a most relevant book for today's political correctness issues, adds this:

But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. (James 1:22-24)
These passages imply that if a professing Christian is still living in sin and resisting God's purifying and changing power in his or her life, then he hasn't fully given his life to God.  This includes sins such as homosexuality, an issue we will discuss in depth in a future article in this series.  Homosexuality is a sin, and one that needs to be repented and cast before the throne of God so that He can work on creating a pure heart in those caught in its snare.  But before I begin getting called bad names for "picking on" homosexuality, realize that we can also fall into traps of lust, premarital sex, idol worship (inluding the love of money - I Timothy 6:10), and many other sins that can control our lives and hinder our testimony and our walk with God.

Many of us claim to be against sin and immorality, but sometimes we are not nearly as eager to stand against it.  John Leo appears to acknowledge our watered down and conditional moral values:

Americans have strong principles, but they reserve the right not to apply them in difficult situations.  Subscribers to the new moral order can have it both ways -- strong principles with a built-in escape hatch.  This would explain much of the gap between polls on moral issues and actual behavior.  One L.A. Times poll, for instance, shows that 57 percent of Americans think abortion is a form of murder....Yet the prevalence of abortion points to a more relaxed moral standard when the chips are down. (3)
"Be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only..."

Unfortunately, political correctness often encourages us to change the Word of God, rather than be changed by it.  This mentality can lead to any number of problems, including (1) rejecting the Bible as "God's Word", (2) treating the Bible continually more allegorically or symbolically, and maybe worst of all (3) altering or ignoring parts of the Bible that do not "fit" with our own or our society's ideas and values.

These attitudes about God's Word are easy to acquire, especially when trying to justify our own actions or ideas.  We begin to make claims like, "That's not really what the Bible says."  Or, "Well, that's just Paul's opinion."  But when we modify or delete portions of Scripture to fit our needs, that's a big deal.  God takes His word very seriously.  In fact, He even places it above His own name (Psalm 138:2).  In John 1:14, Jesus is described as the Word made human. "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us."

Paul, in his letter to the Romans, recognized detrimental effects of not taking God at His Word:

Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.  Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.  Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. (Romans 1:21-25)
I assume you recognize parallels to our own society in Paul's words.  Many seem utterly determined to change God's Word to make it compatible with our own "contemporary" views.  At least one group even took this to the extreme, by producing a version of the Bible modified to be politically correct.  Published in 1995, The New Testament and Psalms: An Inclusive Version attempts to make the Gospels and Epistles and Psalms more "appropriate" for today's society.
This version has undertaken the effort to replace or rephrase all gender-specific language not referring to particular historical individuals, all pejorative references to race, color, or religion, and all identifications of persons by their physical disability alone, by means of paraphrase, alternative renderings, and other acceptable means of conforming the language of the work to an inclusive idea. (4)
Perhaps this seems like a fair enough idea, to word a Bible to be able to bypass race, gender, and other P.C. taboo areas.  But was this really a problem?  I would have to argue that anyone who is offended by gender, race, or religion references in the Bible doesn't understand it anyway, and he certainly doesn't take it seriously as the Word of God.  An editorial from The Boston Herald comments on some of the "corrections" made in the "P.C. Bible."
Gone are references to "light" as good and "dark" as evil, considered offensive to people of color.  In the Lord's Prayer, "Our Father" becomes "Our Father-Mother" (Holy hermaphrodite!).  Jesus is gender-neutral.  Where the chauvinist New Testament referred to him as the "Son of Man," in the neutered version, he is the "Human One."  Nor will he sit at the "right hand of God" -- a slight to lefties.

The changes aren't all cosmetic.  A la Benjamin Spock, children are no longer enjoined to obey their parents but merely to "heed" them (a blow to patriarchalism).

In other words, kids should listen to their parents -- the way they listen to their adolescent friends or MTV -- without giving their words more credence than the other background noise in their lives. (5)

While many of these changes may seem trivial at first glance, they clearly undermine the integrity and inspiration of Scripture as the Holy Word of God.  That's not to say the King James is a perfect translation of the Bible from its original languages; but one cannot excuse deliberate modification of the words as they appear in the Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek texts.  Not only that, but the particular rendition we've been discussing, which includes only the New Testament and Psalms, apparently ignores the even more "un-inclusive" Old Testament.  In rewording the writings of Matthew, John, Paul, and the others, no attention seems to have been given to the predictions and messages of the Old Testament prophets that were fulfilled by Christ in the New Testament.  An editorial in the Wall Street Journal makes this comment:
Needless to say, none of this is very poetic.  It's also pretty pathetic to watch theologians waste their time worrying that a left-handed, blind, black woman might somehow think that the Bible excludes her, when the main message of the text teaches exactly the opposite.  Apparently the contemporary equivalent of pondering how many angels can fit on the head of a pin is to calculate the number of gender offensive words in the Bible.  The theological seminaries aren't immune to the cultural and linguistic extremism that flourishes on many university campuses these days, where words like "freshman" are verboten. (6)
The Boston Herald writer continues:
The Bible (unexpurgated version) is inclusive in the most profound sense of the word.  In addressing the human condition -- that we are both spiritual and physical, beings endowed with free will, who are capable of salvation but prone to sin -- it transcends race and gender, and speaks to our essence.

Called the Good Book, it isn't intended to make readers feel good about themselves but to instruct, comfort and challenge them.

Admittedly, the Bible recognizes differences between men and women, mothers and fathers, parents and children.  Absolute equality isn't the goal.  The kingdom of heaven isn't governed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regs. (7)

The reason that God would likely not be considered "politically correct" under most definitions of the term is that He only produces the truth.  The Bible may seem out of touch with some of today's oversensitive classes of people, but not because the Bible is mixed up.  God is going to call things what they are.  If that means saying that a man has certain duties not obligated to a woman, so be it.  If that means telling someone he is wrong for thinking or doing something, God would rather make him feel guilty than let him continue to do wrong.  That's not insensitivity, that's love.
Other religions are not "acceptable" to God.  While that does not give us, as humans, the right to censor and punish people for their beliefs (that's God's job), neither does it give us any basis to accept or "tolerate" false teaching contrary to God's Word.

Admittedly, the example of The New Testament and Psalms: An Inclusive Version is an extreme case, but we can find plenty of other ways to disregard or destroy parts of the Bible.

Even among those who do accept the Bible as God's Word, for instance, some are still willing to make excuses to justify their actions.  Of homosexuality, for instance, I have often seen the argument, "Well, it's not like it is as bad as other sins..."  Of course, the same reasoning could be used for any number of sins; and from our human perspective, the argument seems to be a plausible one.  However, the primary objective of this article series (and FuS, for that matter) is to help understand how God sees things.  Our Creator never tries to "soften up" a sin, and that certainly includes sexual sin.  Thankfully, His hatred of sin is no deeper than His love and no stronger than His willingness to forgive -- if we will but ask.

Another tempting pitfall used to justify actions is to pass blame onto someone or something else.  It seems to be characteristic of this generation to use other people, the government, the media, or genetics as scapegoats for our own deeds.  On the one hand, media, government, parents, and education have all had failures in various forms; and our DNA is certainly not free from defect.  But, in the end, we are still each personally responsible for our own decisions and actions.

God understands how difficult obedience can be in the midst of parents who set bad examples, teachers who do not teach moral values, preachers who do not follow His Word, or media that promotes sex and violence.  The Lord understands the challenge of living for Him in this day and age, but He also knows the horrible effects of living in sin.

That is why it is crucial not to look past the Word of God.  In Psalm 119:11, David says, "Thy word have I hid in my heart, that I might not sin against thee."  Keeping the Word close to your heart, God can use it to speak to you in times of temptation or doubt.

Paul, in Ephesians 6, calls the Word the "sword of the Spirit."  He includes it as part of the "armor of God," which we will discuss in more detail later.  This armor, Paul says, is to help us to be "able to withstand in the evil day" (Ephesians 6:13).

When we disregard or distort Scripture, it's like a soldier putting down his sword in the midst of a battle.  By ignoring, "modernizing," or otherwise contorting bits and pieces of the Bible that we deem "offensive," we open the door to all kinds of problems, whether it be justifying our sins or becoming "tolerant" of others' wrongs.

As Christians, we should be growing day-by-day in accordance to God's Word.  The Word is extremely powerful if we will allow God to use it to change us.  However, great danger lies in attempting to change the Word to fit our lives or our worldviews.  As a society, we try so hard to eliminate any guilt or remorse for anything that we feel like doing; so if something such as the Bible tells us we're wrong, we dutifully try to change it.  But God does not hesitate to make us feel guilty -- if that's what we need.  "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" (II Timothy 3:16).

Reproof, correction, instruction.  Dangerous words in a politically correct worldview.  They require admission of responsibility and willingness to accept that we may be wrong.  Yet that's exactly how God wants to use His Word in our lives -- to change us.

Christians, please take God's Word seriously.  God takes His Word quite seriously.  Study the Bible constantly, with an open heart, asking God to use it to help you see His truths.  If you find yourself living in habitual sin(s), be it homosexuality, pornography, alcoholism, drug addiction, gambling addiction, or whatever, lay it before the throne of God and allow Him to work change in your heart.

Non-Christians, much (if not all) of what we have been discussing may not be sinking into your heart yet.  But I hope that you can begin to see that God is not out to get you, and any true follower of Christ is not out to get you.  But if you are reading this article with an open heart, perhaps God has already begun to work.  Maybe you are searching for answers, maybe you too are fighting an addiction or temptation you feel is wrong.  I can't promise to provide all the answers, but I hope that you, as well as those who are already saved, will become more willing to look at the world through God's eyes.  Find a church with a pastor who takes the Bible seriously, or open the Book yourself and allow God to reveal Himself through it.

They received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. (Acts 17:11b)

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.  But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness....Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.  Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. (II Timothy 2:15-16,18-19)
 

(1) "Sermon: Is God Politically Correct? Part 3." http://destiny-worldwide.net/rcg/sermon/se112198.htm
(2) Based upon Luke 23:39-43
(3) John Leo.  "My morals, myself."  U.S. News & World Report.  August 13, 2001, Page 10.
(4) The New Testament and Psalms: An Inclusive Version.  General Introduction - Page viii-ix.  Oxford University Press, Inc.
(5) Don Feder.  "This new PC Bible reads like parody but is very serious."  The Boston Herald.  September 11, 1995.  Editorial - Page 21.  Found on LEXIS-NEXIS.
(6) "The PC Bible." Wall Street Journal.  Editorial Page.  September 5, 1995.  Found at http://www.eccker.org/johnf/humor143.htm
(7) Don Feder.  "This new PC Bible reads like parody but is very serious."  The Boston Herald.  September 11, 1995.  Editorial - Page 21.
FuS Space Station  







 
 

They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment; as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed: But thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end.
Psalm 102:26-27
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?
Mark 12:24

footer
the Web - the World - the Walk - the way - the Word - Contact - home
See About FuS for our reprint policy and other information about the site

© 2006 Filling up Space