Thou Shalt
Judge No Other Gods Before Me...
Travis K.
McSherley
August 2004
The liberal
worldview has a big problem with the Christian faith.
Absolutely central
and necessary to that faith is its contention that no other means to salvation
exists but trust in Jesus Christ. Whatever else this means, it doesn't
leave a lot of room for the liberal dogma of inclusivism and relativism
when it comes to faith.
Still,
a
columnist in the Charlotte Observer calls on Christians to have a more
tolerant view of other religions.
It
is sacrilege to some in my faith to be remotely tolerant of other faiths,
and they are quick to declare you "hell-bound" if you refuse to try to
proselytize in the name of Jesus.
During
tough times, and specifically during times of war, we become less accepting
of those who are different, and we call on our gods to take sides.
So we label
others evil or devils or the anti-Christ, making ourselves, in turn, the
chosen ones.
Condemn me if
you wish, but I will not allow religious bigotry to contaminate my soul....
Love or acceptance
of an individual should never be based on that person's religion or nationality
or any other accident of birth.
The basis of
my affection for others will be their own humanity and their treatment
of others.
It bothers me
greatly to see savagery carried out in the name of God, or to watch terror
groups or nations (democratic or otherwise) declare that they are fighting
"holy wars."
We ought to
be careful about what we blame on God, or how we use God as an excuse for
what we want to do to benefit us as individuals or as a country.
Religious folks,
if you must, go through your rituals of ringing bells, lighting candles,
blowing horns and chanting daily prayers, but it is time to stop the ritual
of discrimination and hatred of those who are different.
Believe me,
I know I'll hear from many of you who are ready to tell me how wrong I
am and that I'm probably on my way to hell. I welcome your comments, but
please leave out the Scripture.
This lecture, which
is plenty judgmental in its own right, showcases a bizarre version of supposed
Christianity, but it also demonstrates the sharp contrast between worldviews.
The author labels religion in the category of an "accident of birth," as
though one's faith can never be more than a product of one's environment,
much like a genetic quirk (or defect?). He also seems to lump all
theistic worldviews together -- effectively allowing for Christianity,
Islam, Judaism, Mormonism, Deism, etc., to be equivalent.
The author also
asks readers not to respond to him with Scripture. While I can't
dispute his claims to be a Christian, he clearly does not hold the Word
of God in high enough reverence to allow its truth to be higher than his
own.
But setting
aside all of that, this column -- and many others like it -- is merely
biting back against those "religious" believers who contend that their
faith is real. That the Christian faith grounds itself in the belief
that Christ provides the only possible way to eternal life, is unsettling.
As it should be. But here's the thing: the exclusivist claim of Christianity
-- which was made by Christ
Himself -- does not in and of itself constitute a form of bigotry toward
other people. Certainly, through the ages and even unto present day,
some have claimed the name of the Lord in their personal vendettas against
other people. And let's be clear -- those who have exhibited hatred
in Christ's name have done more to damage the witness of the faith than
can ever be repaired.
Those exceptions,
however, cannot be used to condemn the undeniable crux of the Christian
faith.
That said, no
one ever has the right to tell someone that he is going to hell.
Scripture is clear that we are all deserving of that fate, thus none has
room to be self-righteous of boastful about his flawed self. But
God, whose righteousness demands payment for the transgressions of man,
has provided a worthy sacrifice, upon which all men may attain salvation.
The only way men may attain salvation.
If a Christian
recognizes this "narrow road" that holds the path to salvation, how could
he not become frustrated at the worship of false gods and dead-end religions
like Islam or Hinduism or Buddhism or, certainly, atheism?
For liberalism,
of course, the road is wide enough for all people -- and all faiths --
to pass through. Would that this were the case. No genuine
follower of Christ desires for a fellow member of mankind to end up in
the great fires of hell.
But this faith
thing isn't just made up of religious rituals and lifestyle rules.
It's reality. And as such, there can be no "tolerance" for beliefs
sans Christ to have equal standing. God does demand that we take
sides -- and He demands that we take His side. We can't force
anyone to choose God, and we shouldn't try, but in the end the choice will
be made.
I choose to
follow Christ. |